tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26603666.post7077614520942308565..comments2008-06-04T22:26:38.592-05:00pohlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05831729655618512787noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26603666.post-63249621185404491542008-06-04T22:26:00.000-05:002008-06-04T22:26:00.000-05:00

Everyone's doing it.

Adrian_Ohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00721591129730175021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26603666.post-72244545101379977562008-05-22T17:53:00.000-05:002008-05-22T17:53:00.000-05:00

Of course you should. You'd enjoy it.

sydney_bhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15782403218440471252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26603666.post-90308772481301811322008-05-20T16:14:00.000-05:002008-05-20T16:14:00.000-05:00

new bikes are always a good thing. its time.

sdahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08573201854566191645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26603666.post-29623029331709237242008-05-20T14:20:00.000-05:002008-05-20T14:20:00.000-05:00

Yeah, my bike is a bit heavy. Beerorkid put together a 29er that he said weighed <A HREF="http://www.beerorkid.com/2006/09/01/moots-mooto-x-ybb-my-dream-bike-is-done/" REL="nofollow">about 27lbs</A>. It just occurred to me that I don't even own a scale, or I'd measure mine for comparison. Oh well.<BR/><BR/>A decade of g? Is that measured by the perl version or the version that used to

podunkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05831729655618512787noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26603666.post-40832057783584340602008-05-20T13:35:00.000-05:002008-05-20T13:35:00.000-05:00

If you go for the larger tires you should shell out the bucks to also keep the overall weight the same or less than what you have. If you can reduce weight while increasing circumference then you would really win.<BR/><BR/>I am betting your original tires are not super light.<BR/><BR/>Hey, November is the 10th anniversary of g.

Jon Conradthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16366154865028642877noreply@blogger.com